Running an offsite is one of those things that sounds straightforward until you actually try to do it. Then you realize it’s more like attempting to teach a cat how to swim.. like, it’s possible, but the trial and error is going to leave you with scars and trauma for you and the cat. The truth is, I didn’t learn how to run these from some leadership book. In fact, there aren’t many practical resources out there on this topic. Zack Urlocker (famous to me from MySQL) has a great article on the subject, and the HBR book “How to Plan a Team Offsite That Actually Works” is pretty good, and I’ve read and can partly “Retreats That Work“. But compared to other tactical or strategic business topics, there is suprisingly little stuff out there on how to plan and run what I think is one of the most important processes in a functioning executive team. So most of what I know has been pieced together by experimenting, failing, adjusting, and occasionally stumbling onto something that worked.

Over the years, I’ve realized that the best offsites aren’t just about staring at spreadsheets in a new zip code. They need to hit a few big goals if they’re going to be worth all the planning headaches.

  1. First, they give us strategic focus. It’s the one time everyone can step out of the chaos of Slack notifications and email fires and actually think about the future of the company. No one is allowed to answer a support ticket from a kayak.
  2. Second, they create leadership alignment. If you’ve ever tried to get a group of executives pointing in the same direction, you know it’s a bit like herding caffeinated cats (second cat reference already). Offsites are where we stop doing the daily functional stuff and agree on what we’re actually chasing this quarter or even the year.
  3. And finally, they build team cohesion. This doesn’t mean trust falls or awkward icebreakers where you have to say your “spirit animal.” It means real connection. Cooking dinner together, laughing at terrible pickleball form, or having spouses bond over yoga and day drinking. That’s the glue that makes the work stick.

Strategy and alignment and synergy and other business words are important. But if you don’t also have a little fun, then honestly, what’s the point?

Who Gets Invited?

One of the first questions people ask me is who actually gets to come. The answer is simple: just the people who report directly to me. That means my VPs and my C-levels. Keeping the group small matters. Too many people and it stops being a strategy session and starts to feel like you’re at an HOA meeting with whiskey. That’s actually the only way I would attend an HOA meeting, but that’s besides the point.

The Rhythm of Our Offsites

Over time, we’ve settled into a pattern that works for us.

  • We hold one-day offsites each quarter, right at the beginning of the quarter, to reset and align.
  • At the beginning of Q4, we host a three-day offsite. This one is much more involved, both in planning and in structure.

That Q4 gathering has become the cornerstone of our leadership rhythm. It’s where we not only map out the next year but also strengthen the relationships that help us make better decisions together.

The Big Airbnb Weekend

An example AirBNB we’ll rent

The three-day offsite is a little different. Actually, a lot different. Instead of cramming into a conference room for eight hours, we rent a big Airbnb within driving distance. It has to have something that makes it feel special. Maybe it’s a weird swimming pool, a pickleball court, a river with kayaks, or a beach nearby. Basically, something that makes it feel less like a board meeting and more like an executive retreat with paddleboarding skills designed to test our key-person insurance. A lot of these places are pretty weird. Getting a place where 5 couples can comfortably stay in a single house means either super luxurious mansions, or strange homes that have winding corridors, mapping our the evolutionary path of the renovations that made it a desirable property for events like ours.

We also come prepared. That means swimsuits, a fully stocked bar, and a Nintendo Switch for late-night Mario Kart battles. For the record, those races have only ended in tears two or three times, which I consider an acceptable casualty rate.

Spouses and partners join us for the whole weekend, from Friday through Sunday. Friday night we cook a big meal together. Saturday night we all go out to dinner. In between, the partners, who jokingly call themselves “the tech wives” even though the group definitely includes men, do their own thing. They go to yoga, they day drink, they sometimes prepare lunch for us, and in return we make sure to take them out for dinners. They get a vacation, and we get the benefit of stronger connections across the group.

A Tech Wife Grilling

It might sound unusual to mix work and family life, but it has been incredibly useful. When the people at home know and trust the people at work, it changes the dynamic completely. It creates more openness, more support, and a lot more resilience when things inevitably get tough.

Timing Is Everything

When you schedule an offsite matters almost as much as where you hold it. For example, I’ve found the sweet spot for our first offsite of the year is the third week of January.

  • If you schedule it the first week of January, no one is really in the office yet. Everyone is still half in vacation mode.
  • If you push it to the last week of January, the new year’s energy has already started to fade.

So the third week is usually just right.

For our one-day offsites, I like Mondays. That’s already the day we hold our management meetings, which means I have two hours of my executives’ time on the calendar anyway. It’s easier to rearrange schedules if we’re already starting from that block.

The Q4 offsite follows a set pattern too. We begin Friday morning at 9 a.m. and wrap up Sunday afternoon. Since we usually rent the Airbnb through Monday, people often stick around a little longer. Sometimes kids show up and end up swimming in the pool or playing pickleball, which is honestly a pretty great way to close things out.

Wrapping Up Part 1

That’s the foundation: who comes, when we meet, and how we structure the year. These basics took a few years of trial and error to figure out, but once we found the rhythm, it became much easier to plan and run these without burning out.

In Part 2, I’ll share what actually happens inside the offsite, including how I structure agendas, the kinds of exercises we run, and why you should never try to build your offsite plan in a Word document.

There is now a Part 2!

Previous ArticleNext Article
I help companies turn their technical ideas into reality.

CEO @Sourcetoad and @OnDeck

Founder of Thankscrate and Data and Sons

Author of Herding Cats and Coders

Fan of judo, squash, whiskey, aggressive inline, and temperamental British sports cars.

Leave a Reply

Image generation comparison from February 2026

I spend a lot of time generating images these days for presentations. My typical workflow is fairly scientific: I ask Midjourney to produce a relatively cute image of a frog, a toad, a robot, or some other vaguely anthropomorphic creature doing something related to the slide I’m about to present.

Once I get the image, I expand the background by about 90% so the character ends up in the corner of the slide. That gives me a nice, relatively clean area to drop text on top. Sometimes I use Photoshop to do the expansion. Sometimes Midjourney cooperates. ChatGPT is actually pretty good at this too. Nano Banana is… enthusiastic. It tends to try a little too hard right now.

That’s fun and all. But the more interesting comparison isn’t cute amphibians. It’s boring enterprise diagrams.

Recently I had to generate some architecture visuals for an RFP response. Rather than suffer alone, I decided to turn it into a model comparison experiment.

Below is a slightly simplified (but very real-feeling) prompt I used. The company is fictional. The buzzwords are not:

Create a clean, executive-level architecture diagram titled “Closed-Loop Member Intelligence Platform.”

The layout should be 16:9 and structured left to right with a circular optimization loop surrounding the system.

On the left side, show multiple member touchpoints feeding into the platform:
- Website (class browsing, account login)
- Mobile App (workout tracking, push notifications)
- In-Club Kiosks (check-in terminals)
- Wearable Device Integrations (fitness trackers)

Label this section: “Member Interactions Across Digital & Physical Channels.”

All touchpoints should flow into a large central hub labeled:

“Unified Member Profile & Real-Time Event Engine”

Inside the central hub, include:

- Web SDK
- Mobile SDK
- API Gateway
- Event Streaming Layer
- Clickstream Data Capture
- CRM Data Sync
- Identity Resolution Engine

Include a small sub-caption:
“Event-level data unifies anonymous visitors and active members into a single dynamic profile.”

From the central hub, arrows should flow to a right-side activation layer labeled:

“Real-Time Engagement & Orchestration”

Include these outputs:

- Personalized Workout Recommendations
- Dynamic Class Availability Messaging
- Triggered Retention Offers
- Membership Upgrade Campaigns
- A/B Testing & Experimentation Engine

Surround the entire diagram with a circular arrow labeled:

“Continuous Optimization & Revenue Growth”

Along the circular loop, include metrics:

- Engagement
- Conversion
- Retention
- Lifetime Value

Design style should be modern, minimal, and suitable for an enterprise SaaS presentation.
Use neutral tones with one accent color to indicate data flow.
Avoid clutter.
Make the architecture clear and readable for both technical and executive audiences.

Here are the results.

ChatGPT

Clear winner for “looks like a human consultant made this at 11:30 p.m. before a board meeting.” The text was incredibly legible. The layout was balanced. The hierarchy made sense. It genuinely looked like something you’d expect in a mid-market SaaS pitch deck.

I even did a reverse image search on some of the icons. No exact matches. That suggests they were generated rather than assembled from some common icon pack. Which is pretty cool.

Claude

Claude did something interesting. Instead of just giving me a static diagram, it generated a React application that rendered the architecture visually inside its canvas. I should have guessed this is what that nerd would do… in fact I did guess, but whatever.

That has upsides. I can tweak the code. I can modify the layout. I can version control it. That’s appealing to the nerd in me.

But technically it failed the homework assignent. It wasn’t what I asked for. I asked for a diagram image. What I got was a React app that displayed a diagram that I had to screenshot.

That said, I actually liked the aesthetic. It felt a little more “me.” Slightly less textbook. Slightly more product-thinking.

Gemini (Nano Banana)

The undisputed champion of 2026 in image generation, nano banana, was actually my least favorite of all of the designs. I think there’s something really weird about the arrows on the outside ring of this diagram. Why are there two arrows between “Engagement” and “Conversion”? Why are they different sizes? I did actually find a couple of exact matches when searching for some of these icons here, so so there might be some assembly on top of generation going here, but I cannot tell because these icons are so universal that it’s likely that that could just be a coincidence.

Midjourney

Ah, Midjourney. My current favorite for keynote frogs.

Completely and utterly useless for generating readable diagrams.

It’s phenomenal at stylized imagery. I’ve tuned it so much over time that it practically knows my aesthetic preferences better than I do. It’s like it’s been trained specifically to make amphibians that align with my personality.

The Omni feature (object permanence) is genuinely impressive. If you’re telling a visual story and need a character to look consistent across multiple scenes, or you’re creating a children’s book to convince your six-year-old that haircuts are not a violation of human rights, it’s fantastic.

But enterprise architecture diagrams? Nope, sucksville.

Wrapping Up

I was pretty sure that nano banana was going to run away with this one. Everyone I know works in banking or finance or medicine has been telling me how great the model is for generating diagrams and process flows. They’ve been raving about how things that were not possible three months ago are now completely durable with this model. It was a little bit of a surprise to see that my personal favorite was good old-fashioned ChatGPT. I think, for my personal use, I’m probably going to use Claude to generate diagrams because they’re a lot easier for me to tweak once they’ve been generated.

That said, I think this experiment showed that when I do this kind of work in the future, I’m just going to load up the same prompt in three different models and just pick the one I like the most. Some of it’s going to be personal tastes; some of it’s going to be how well the model interpreted the prompt, and some of it’s going to be the state of that particular LLM and its model on that given week.

And I’m going to stick to only using Midjourney for generating cute pictures of toads.